Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Street and Racing Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. –  Rob e  rt  01:52, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Street and Racing Technology
Judging by the tone, his article seems to have been written by an employee of DaimlerChrysler for the express purpose of advertising an engineering team and its products. In my opinion, there is no academic or informational value to retaining this article; we may as well add an article about IBM's department of accounts payable. Wbutler 01:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete As per above. will381796 01:45, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV Vanity Olorin28 03:52, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete borderline spam Masterhomer [[Image:Yin_yang.svg|20px|]] 03:57, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It reads like a promotional pamphlet. B.Wind 03:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Completely rewrite. A search for DaimlerChrysler PLUS "Street and Racing Technology" turns up about 800 Google hits, many from mainstream automotive review sites. I agree the current article sounds like an advertisement (has anyone checked to see if it was copied from somewhere?) But there is a legitimate topic. Firebug 05:53, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advertising/marketingspeak. there's no need to keep this in order to write a new article. Post a request at Talk:DaimlerChrysler if you have to. - Mgm|(talk) 11:24, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete You could make a case for an article on this, but there's nothing worth keeping in the current version. Richfife 20:29, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Completely rewrite I think that their should be an article on the SRT group, but this must have been copied off of the SRT website. Poonkla 09:25, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.--MONGO 03:26, 7 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.