Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Street comedy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 23:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Street comedy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

To be honest, I think it's a joke article. But let us for a minute assume that this is intended as a serious article. It's about a form of comedy and Internet meme that apparently consists of "spitting out whatever [pops in one's] head". It supposedly was invented by someone working for Game Informer. Not so surprisingly, all four references are to the website of Game Informer. Two of them don't discuss the concept. The other two show that it might be a common inside joke for the Game Informer staff. I'll even grant that this is perhaps a joke somewhat familiar to the Game Informer faithful. But I fail to see any sign that the rest of the world has noticed. Pichpich (talk) 18:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedily Delete It's either a joke or some variety of spam to generate hits. I see no indication from anything that would qualify as a reliable source that the subject matter exists at all, let alone is notable in any respect. I think this probably qualifies for Speedy Deletion under some combination of G-1, G-3 or G-11. Fladrif (talk) 18:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - Tim "Grumpypants" Davenport thinks that this article was something made up in one day. Carrite (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I thought about it but technically, I don't think this quite fits any speedy deletion criteria. Nevertheless I certainly won't have any complaints if an admin decides that there's no need to drag this out for days. Pichpich (talk) 20:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Carrite's incisive though self-referential analysis.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  22:31, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom and Carrite. ö   Brambleberry   of   RiverClan  01:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.