Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Street grid of landmarks in the 19th-century Los Angeles business district


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Moot. Moved to template space. A WP:MFD would be needed to delete it if it is considered problematic there.  Sandstein  09:50, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Street grid of landmarks in the 19th-century Los Angeles business district

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Wikipedia is WP:NOT a map. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 20:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 20:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 20:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Indeed a vector graphic with hyperlinks or something of the sort would be needed. A grid of streets just doesn't work in a wikitable; I'm sorry, the half-bounded intersections and cramped vertical text look poor and unusable even in template space, with cell sizes determined by the amount of text rather than geographic scale. Reywas92Talk 23:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because they are the same format:


 * Delete both - Looks like a lot of admirable work went into these, but yeah, enwiki isn't a map. Hog Farm Bacon 20:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * These are maps used as guides to orient the reader as to the locations of buildings in an article, a geographic index if you will. Articles include Broadway (Los Angeles) and Central Business District, Los Angeles (1880–1899). As the same grid serves several articles, (those plus Spring Street, Main Street, Los Angeles Street and Historic Core, Los Angeles) it was better to have the grids as separate documents that could be inserted into multiple articles. They weren’t meant to stand alone. I suppose people would be happier if this was a vector graphic with hyperlinks but I’m only learning how to do that. I think this is intuitive and useful in the articles, but whatever, if the majority think the articles are more useful without this, I have to accept that. Keizers (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * - In that case, a template might be what you wanted. As this stands, it is in the article space, so it is functioning as a stand-alone article in this form. Hog Farm Bacon 21:13, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I moved the content to the Template namespace. So I guess the articles for deletion don't exist anymore. Keizers (talk) 22:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.