Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streets of Rage Remake


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Sango 123  00:06, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Streets of Rage Remake
Fan remake of Streets of Rage. Doesn't have a release date yet and wikipdia is not a crystal ball. -- Koffieyahoo 02:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Koffieyahoo - doesn't have a release date and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, and it is not place to post remakes of games that fans make. --S-man 07:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable fan remake, also Wikipedia is not a crystall ball. J I P  | Talk 07:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom -- Whpq 12:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all incomplete fan games. The finish rate is quite low, so htese are crystal balls. Ace of Sevens 15:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 21:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I strongly disagree with deleting this article. It is a very popular subject. More information will be coming shortly, just hold tight. There are many other fangames that have no date releases. Atleast we have a rough idea of the release. Grand Theftendo just has a release of "2007". Please keep this article. --Gray- -Wolf 03:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment the above user is the creator of the article. -- Koffieyahoo 04:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Are you kidding? I found this article very useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.213.167 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete until it gets released. --Slgr @ ndson (page - messages - contribs) 04:09, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Do not delete! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.11.213.167 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment struck out the above, as it is the second keep by 24.11.213.167. -- Koffieyahoo 04:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Keep a while longer, give it a month.--DavidLee1077 04:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep it should stay.--IAmTheWalrusAreYou 04:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Above users only has edits to this AfD and their user page Wildthing61476 18:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep I can't wait for SORR. Please keep it. you haters.--SofaKingWeToddEd 04:23, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment to the closing admin: above three votes are the first edits by those users. -- Koffieyahoo 04:31, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Mitaphane talk 16:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I like this article --JP17cc 18:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Above users only has edits to this AfD and their user page Wildthing61476 18:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep There seems to be no reason why to delete this article. --HatcherTheSnatcher 18:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and someone take these socks to the laundry will ya? Wildthing61476 18:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep That's gross. --FastDbz12 18:44, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Above users only has edits to this AfD and their user page Wildthing61476 18:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment I too only have edits here, because that's the reason why I signed up. --Gray- -Wolf 20:04, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a crystal ball. After the release the article can be created again (with references). -- Cate 16:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator, this article is premature. RFerreira 19:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, WP:NOT a crystal ball. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:33, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.