Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streisand Effect


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Streisand Effect
Neologism started at blogs KittenKlub 11:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - The phrase does generate a lot of G-hits, although most of them seem to be duplicates of the original blog post. Not sure what kind of weight that carries.  I would change to Keep if I saw more major news sources mention it.  --cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: Didn't "Jump the shark" get started about the same way? With 10,000 Google hits and the fact that the phrase has been around for a while, I get the impression this will stick around. It seems to me we could help readers understand the phrase. It's true though, that Google News shows no results.Noroton 21:57, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - useless neologism. Valrith 23:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. The concept may deserve an article, but not under that name.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 00:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.