Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stress measurement in aviation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Moved. to User:Liroykwunwai/sandbox by, (Technically it's not draft but whatever it's userfied so everyone's happy .... I hope! ). – Davey 2010 Talk 00:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC) (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Stress measurement in aviation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I actually declined this at AfC and the author has without further explanation, moved it themselves and if it wasn't that this currently looks more like a journal report, this may have been salvageable. Notifying author. SwisterTwister  talk  22:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment (but I'll change to keep unless something persuades me otherwise). This doesn't look like a "journal report" to me and even if it did it wouldn't be a reason for deletion. I also can't grasp the concept of an article being salvageable except for the fact that it "looks more like a journal report". A very peculiar nomination and one that I am not attracted to at all. Thincat (talk) 23:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment A little research via the article's talk page shows this to be a student project created article. That is neither a reason to delete nor retain it. Perhaps someone who knows how to alert one of our education facilitators could do so in order to minimise any misunderstandings. Fiddle   Faddle  23:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, yes, that's helpful. This article has been produced as part of https://dashboard.wikiedu.org/courses/University_of_Western_Ontario/Human_Factors_in_Aviation_%28Fall_2015%29 under the [//meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Education_Foundation Wiki Education Foundation] umbrella. I personally don't feel any need to intervene. Thincat (talk) 08:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment This isn't my class, but I don't think deletion is the right option. Some aviation folks can hopefully chime in if there's a better page on human factors/stress in aviation. If not, a cursory look at the available sources shows me there's more than enough to make an article on the subject. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete For the article to remain someone has to confirm that the subject of this article meets Wikipedia's notability criteria as defined in WP:GNG. I would change my "delete" recommendation if someone found 2-3 sources per WP:42 which featured the subject of this article as their own subject. The effort is nice but the base of a Wikipedia article is 2-3 good sentences backed by 2-3 good sources - someone please show that base to me.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  18:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, good grief! I never imagined anyone would suggest the topic isn't notable. The nomination didn't suggest it anyway. Surely all seven papers are specifically about the topic of measuring stress for flight crews. Certainly not mentioning it merely in passing. I've found three books on the general topic of stress for flight crews if someone wants to extract further material from these. Maybe you are wishing to disregard technical papers although there are numerous on NASA-TLX in the aviation context. Here's a nice paper if you are interested. Thincat (talk) 20:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Question - This is a student assignment that wasn't ready for mainspace (and is clear with from the nominators comments). It's obviously not ready for mainspace. Anyone opposed to moving the article back into the editor's userspace? Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:56, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy WP:IAR move back to Draft space and Close on the basis that it is likely to be notable and arrived in main namespace by complete accident, and is a student project which may come to fruition with a decent article if they are given grace time to make that happen. Fiddle   Faddle  16:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Move (I suggest to User:Liroykwunwai/sandbox) as is now being very sensibly suggested. It was not the creator who submitted it to WP:AFC and things have shot off the rails. Thincat (talk) 11:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:17, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Merge with Occupational stress and redirect. Most of this article is not about aviation at all, only the short section on NASA touches on it. But it can fill a gap at Occupational stress, which at present has nothing on the measurement of stress. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I userfied the article after communicating with the instructor in the class. Hopefully they will be able to turn it into a viable article. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.