Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streum on studio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to E.Y.E.: Divine Cybermancy. (non-admin closure) sst✈  03:36, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Streum on studio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Developer of notable video games doesn't make developer notable. Fails notability, no reliable sources have reported on the studio. Soetermans. T / C 15:37, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  16:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: Per . Chrisw80 (talk) 21:54, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:35, 12 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment The games are notable but I had hard time finding articles mentioning the studio being about the studio and not the games. In addition I think I've seen other unnotable developers which had made notable games not have their own articles. Yet I can't vote for delete because at the time I found it odd to not to be able to view the other developers' past work. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 20:10, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:17, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect' to E.Y.E.: Divine Cybermancy, given that there new Space Hulk hasn't appeared to receive any significant coverage yet. edtiorEهեইдအ😎 05:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect I think a redirect to E.Y.E.: Divine Cybermancy is a good idea as well. It's their sole game as of yet. Space Hulk is 2016 TBA. That means it may easily slip in to 2017... --Mr. Magoo (talk) 13:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I added a mention of E.Y.E.: Divine Cybermancy to Space Hulk: Deathwing as well. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 13:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as a non-notable video game developer failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Does not meet WP:NCORP and having developed notable video games is WP:NOTINHERITED. Usable sources, such as, exist, but are not in-depth and focus on games rather than developer. Redirect might be suitable as a valid search term. —  HELL KNOWZ  ▎TALK 14:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. The only acceptable-ish sources I could find that kind of discuss the company itself are this and this - and that's still a big stretch, especially when taking WP:CORPDEPTH into consideration. I didn't find any sources that cover the company in-depth at all, so passing WP:GNG is out. And because of WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NCORP isn't met either.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   07:43, 26 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.