Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strideapp


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:43, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Strideapp

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NSOFT. Was PROD'ed before with the reason: No indication that this application satisfies the applicable notability guidelines. Somewhat promotional in tone, but not blatant enough for speedy deletion. PROD was removed without providing any reason why this article should stay.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 11:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 11:34, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  12:01, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:29, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: ZDNet and GeedWire are both RS. Not super extensive, but enough to keep. Oaktree b (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete The product in question isn't even named this anymore, and so all the listed sources are extremely out of date. Steven Walling &bull; talk  04:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak delete. The ZDNet and GeekWire sources are both routine coverage of an acquisition which rely heavily on quotes from one of the founders of Stride; the Techcrunch article is better but WP:TECHCRUNCH cautions that they have a habit of relying on press releases and other PR material and might not demonstrate notability. I found more GeekWire coverage which is again an interview with a Stride representative and doesn't count towards notability. The fact that the sources are old or that the app has changed its name is not a reason for deletion, but on looking through them I can't see any evidence for notability. Caeciliusinhorto-public (talk) 09:03, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.