Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MastCell Talk 23:24, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Contested PROD : This sports event fails WP:NOT policy as it is for an event without any demonstrated enduring notability. Only sources are of the routine coverage type any sports event gets. Mt king  (edits)  02:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Until the MMA Project Notability discussion is resolved this one should be kept. There was a women's Bantamweight World Title match on the card after all. Also if you're going to put up a notice shouldn't you put a tag on the page any also link it to the omnibus notability page? Otherwise it basically amounts to subterfuge. Beansy (talk) 04:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * WP:NOT is policy, nothing at the MMA Project Notability discussion can change that. Mt  king  (edits)  05:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 06:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 06:09, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak delete The article consists only of the fight results, which means the article fails WP:ROUTINE. The only notable thing about this event was a woman's championship fight and I don't think that's quite enough to show this passes WP:EVENT. Astudent0 (talk) 16:10, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This fight card doesn't pass WP:EVENT and the coverage fails WP:ROUTINE. The only unusual thing appears to be the women's championship fight, but the organizers considered that minor enough that it doesn't even get top billing (and the coverage of the event mentions it only briefly). Mdtemp (talk) 19:03, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails routine or something like that. Portillo (talk) 08:28, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The article cites no non-MMA sources and a quick Google search suggests there are none, resulting in a borderline WP:GNG fail. The article contains no well-sourced prose, as requested by WP:SPORTSEVENT, and contains only routine fight results.  --TreyGeek (talk) 16:13, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, because the subject is clearly important enough to be on Wikipedia and no one could seriously say otherwise. In fact, I have encountered the various incarnations of the guy who started this discussion elsewhere as he has been posting requests and sending out emails for people to come vote in these MMA discussions all over the place while gloating about how he is getting away using multiple accounts to fix the votes.  See here, for example.  I hate to be a snitch, but when I tried to engage with this dude and he blew me off and not in a good way! This charlatan is playing y'all for suckas and that ain't right!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlito's Way or the Highway Star (talk • contribs) 17:05, 19 May 2012 (UTC)   Striking comments of sock of indef blocked user. --TreyGeek (talk) 21:47, 19 May 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.