Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stringlish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  23:15, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Stringlish
Not notable neologism Hpuppet - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 20:14, 15 March 2006 (UTC) (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax/Vanity/Nonsense.  Can't this be speedied as nonsense?  Slowmover 20:18, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Erred on the side of caution, but brought here instead of prod because if enough people say that it should just get WP:SNOWed. Hpuppet - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 20:25, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hoax, non-notable, nonsense. Bucketsofg 20:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Delete immediately.
 * Delete- Yet more evidence that Speedy Deletion does not have anywhere near enough criteria. Reyk 23:45, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Get rid of this nonsense as quickly as possible. --Ricaud 00:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Patent nonsense. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Fan1967 00:27, 16 March 2006
 * Speedy Delete Non-notable. Nonsense. Incredible Article has no basis of trurth that merit to be published
 * Delete, essentially a vanity page with no verifiable evidence, it is indeed just something made up at school one day. Does not fit into any speedy category, as far as I can discern (mores the pity). Sliggy 15:11, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.