Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stripped Down


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus to keep per WP:NALBUM exists, albeit a less-than-satisfactory one considering the majority (used in a strict sense, that is >50%) ignore the sentence starting with "Notability aside..." (permalink).

Sources found here should be incorporated into the article so that the article is reasonably detailed, also per WP:NALBUM, to avoid being re-nominated for deletion. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 09:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Stripped Down

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I am uncertain if this article passes WP:NALBUM. Only coverage is from Allmusic. No substantial information regarding the composition, recording, production could be found. Given that "stripped-down" is a common word used in acoustic music, I am not very fond of redirect as a solution in this case. HĐ (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. HĐ (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment - found another review, though not sure if this is a reliable source. -- Ashley yoursmile!  14:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I am also uncertain with its reliability. But even if it is, I don't think it's sufficient for a reasonably detailed article. HĐ (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 *  Keep or redirect - Keep, or redirect to Rick Springfield discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:27, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * What is your rationale for keep? HĐ (talk) 03:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 *  Reply - There is no reason why the history of the article needs to be purged. For this reason, I am fine with either keeping or redirecting the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I am uncertain if this article should be redirected, the title could be confused with "stripped-down music" (acoustic music), a fairly common term that is used in music journalism. HĐ (talk) 02:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 *  Reply - Put a hat note at the top of the article to which the term is redirected. --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:54, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , you've been participating in several AfDs and yet that's your kind of reasoning? 🤦 With all due respect, your reasoning is very very shallow and is a form of WP:NOREASON. You can't just be fine with either keeping or redirecting the article, for God's sake. If you vote to keep the article, you have to prove that it meets WP:GNG and/or in this case WP:NALBUM by presenting sources you find about the subject. Same goes for voting to redirect or delete it, where you have to prove that it fails WP:GNG. I suggest you read WP:BEFORE and WP:ATA before you participate in every AfD and improve your reasoning. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 12:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 *  Reply - I disagree. I simply do not want the article history deleted, which I think is acceptable.  For that reason, I am fine with either keep or redirect. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:46, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , you obviously did NOT understand what I said. Sheesh. 🤦 ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 00:12, 1 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep Charted on a Billboard chart. [].Donaldd23 (talk) 22:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Does not make it inherently notable. Notability guideline says that if there is insufficient material for a reasonably detailed article, it should be merged or redirected to a related article. I do not see this article could escape its current Stub-class. HĐ (talk) 02:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Coverage is scarce since there are articles mentioning the live concert itself than the album. However, I managed to find a few reliable sources about the live album:, and . With these and the sources indicated above, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 12:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:35, 5 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 03:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep As per Donaldd23, got charted on a Billboard chart hence passes WP:NALBUM. Pilean (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.