Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strobelite Seduction


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JForget 01:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Strobelite Seduction

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:NALBUMS nothing but a tracklisting, fails notability for an article about an album Alan  -  talk  21:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NALBUMS --Fbifriday (talk) 22:24, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:ALBUMS provides the reasons to keep, not delete. Rlendog (talk) 01:41, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 22:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable album by notable artist.--Michig (talk) 08:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - notable artist, album has a notable song Move for Me which has climbed high in a notable chart. This article needs to be expanded, but that is what stub tags are for. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 09:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Michig and Doomsdayer520. Notable artist and album. Article needs expansion, not deletion.  Gongshow  Talk 09:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow Keep. Another waste of time.--Epeefleche (talk) 01:26, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Meets WP:NALBUMS as an officially released album by a notable artist. And at least one review is linked in the article. If it were just a track listing (which it is not) it would be a candidate for merge (per WP:NALBUMS), not delete. Rlendog (talk) 01:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.