Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stroma (philosophy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. and draftify, which I will do momentarily. Star  Mississippi  22:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Stroma (philosophy)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article is little more than a definition that is already covered almost word for word in Materialism and given the topic likely can't be expanded more. I did PROD this but the PROD was removed simply with an edit to add in a link to Materialism, no article expansion. Could also be handled as a redirect merge? RegistryKey(RegEdit) 05:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 05:54, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I've already changed it and I have expanded the content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pepeh17 (talk • contribs) 06:03, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 03:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems to be developing. Hyperbolick (talk) 07:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. The sourcing is extremely weak, and not independent at all. All four sources are primary, one of which is a Youtube video. This should not be kept as is, but draftified at best. Geschichte (talk) 09:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. Ok Geschichte Thank you! I'll be looking for the original sources. That video of the author, Gustavo Bueno is magnificent and he inspired me to write the article Pepeh17 (talk) 23:47, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Draftify It seems like an article can be made out of this eventually, but it's not at that point yet IMO. I don't see anything wrong with drafting it so it can be improved though. I suggest that the author send it through AfC before recreating it so they can get feedback on it and possibly avoid it being sent back through AfD again. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify - It's premature to delete since the article is still taking shape and there is some evidence of work on the ideas by people other than Gustavo Bueno, but https://www.semanticscholar.org/search?q=Gustavo%20Bueno&sort=total-citations does not show any works with over 17 citations. At the worst, much of the content can be used in the Gustavo Bueno article. &mdash; Charles Stewart (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.