Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strong Heart Study


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Girth Summit  (blether) 18:10, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Strong Heart Study

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article created solely to promote the study. Fails WP:GNG, with not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
 * The study has produced lots of highly-cited papers, as can be seen by simply clicking on the word "scholar" above. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. There are (as Phil notes) literally scores of oft-cited academic papers, and additionally a quick Google Books yields a great deal of independent coverage, e.g. 1 2 3. A thorough WP:BEFORE search would have uncovered all of this. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:20, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  03:30, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Snow keep True enough, poking your head under the academic bonnet shows this to have been a big thing. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:57, 2 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.