Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strong monad

Strong monad

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article is >90% mathematical notation and diagrams, and minimal general-interest content. Looks like an excerpt from a research paper. WP:NOTTEXTBOOK: article should not be presented on the assumption that the reader is well-versed in the topic's field. If content is useful for encyclopedia, it might be summarized and moved to Monad (category theory). beefyt (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 July 16.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:12, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:22, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; a definition pulled from a research-paper with insufficient usage by others. Walsh90210 (talk) 22:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, or TNT if someone has the expertise. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)