Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Structurae


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus; default to keep. Petros471 20:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Structurae
Fails WP:WEB and WP:ADS guidelines. Alexa ranking of 124,221 .--TBC TaLk?!? 04:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak delete per nom. —Ben FrantzDale 12:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and a lack of third party verification. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Wafulz (talk • contribs).
 * Keep all the reviews at Alexa are 5 star. It is one of the few high quality web resources for engineers, which are out trafficed by more popular topics. For its field I think it is important. DVD+ R/W 01:29, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
 * keep. Definitely useful website. ""lack of verification" simply means laziness. The site is even registered at the Library of Congress!  Mukadderat 19:20, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.