Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StuMagz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

StuMagz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Is not notable enough. Appears to be a local brand, unknown outside its hometown. 2Joules (talk) 05:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note to Closing Admin The nominator has been blocked as a sock  HighKing++ 12:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:40, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:40, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 05:40, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Tanneruvenugopalam (talk) 09:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Striking off commentary by confirmed sockpuppet. -The Gnome (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 11:18, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Striking off commentary by confirmed sockpuppet master. -The Gnome (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)


 * I feel this page shouldn't be deleted. Think More notability is provided for Buzz. Johnhexer (talk) 11:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Striking off commentary by confirmed sockpuppet. -The Gnome (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Hope it 'shouldn't deleted. It looks fine. As per my research stuMagz got notable power.Tanneruvenugopalam (talk) 09:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Striking off commentary by confirmed sockpuppet. -The Gnome (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Is this about schools?! I'm outta here. I was never here. -The Gnome (talk) 17:42, 25 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes This is About schools, Colleges and Universities. Motto is to make digitized environment in EdTech Industry. They are making sure all the colleges, Schools in India are digitized in the vision of Make in India by Narendra ModiVijayabhaskar02 (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Digital Education portalVijayabhaskar02 (talk) 06:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Are you, Vijayabhaskar02, in any way whatsoever related to StuMagz? -The Gnome (talk) 13:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I Am no were related to stuMagz. I was delegate for GES 2017 Summit in Hyderabad,India for which Ivanka Trump is the Chief Guest. As this stuMagz startup was mentioned on the Board pitches regarding development in Indian Colleges and Schools. As am a Journalist i was curious to know about this Indian Startup for which Richard Branson Tweeted them too. And then made my research and Contributions to Wikipedia community.Vijayabhaskar02 (talk) 15:11, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Striking off commentary by confirmed sockpuppet master. -The Gnome (talk) 22:20, 10 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Note to admins : Some comments above were not posted here by the editors signing them. They were copied & pasted here from elsewhere by Curb Safe Charmer, ostensibly in good faith. Irrespective of the copyist's intentions, such a move is highly irregular as it opens the door for chaotic controversies in AfDs, and it should actively be disallowed. (We would potentially have editors objecting to their comments appearing here, imports of irrelevant comments, conversations without the editors whose comments were copied, and so on.) There is no justification, e.g. "the editors are newbies," that would permit such an arbitrary, distorting action. Editors are also  encouraged to look up WP:TALKO. -The Gnome (talk) 07:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * As The Gnome has raised this at WT:AFD I think there is the best place to discuss the rights or wrongs of this. To clarify though, the 'elsewhere' that I moved the comments from was this AfD's own talk page. It was clear to me that the editors who started to justify keeping the article had intended to contribute to the deletion discussion and just did so in the wrong place. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * All these editors turned out to be sockpuppets. There is a lesson there, I think, for all of us, and it is to leave things well enough alone! If an editor wants to participate and contribute somewhere, we could show them how but we should not carry their participation forward for them. Nothing good can ever come out of doing their work for them: At best, the editors remain clueless; at worst, we're helping miscreants. -The Gnome (talk) 21:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)