Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stu Strumwasser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Nakon 03:34, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

Stu Strumwasser

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self-published author with very little secondary coverage; fails general notability. Previously speedied under A7 and G11 but recreated under modified name: see Stuart Strumwasser. Blackguard 21:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - It seems that the only actual coverage of this guy is not referenced in the article. Pop star wannabe: Stu Strumwasser has raised millions with natural Snow Beverages, [//news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1876&dat=20060219&id=gQwoAAAAIBAJ&sjid=idAEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6709,1196544&hl=en Did you see this? ], Twitter investor hid earnings from Brooklyn husband while seeking child support: suit these might support an article just not the puff piece that exists now. Also none of the citations in the article point to anything. Jbh (talk) 22:55, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:16, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the coverage seems broad or deep enough to me to pass WP:GNG. Jbh (talk) 01:26, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment This is a recently created article (two weeks ago), but it came into being in the form it is now. There are plenty of sources about a Stu Strumwasser who founded a cola company, sued his wife, and also was in a band. So far I have not been able to connect those to the book, nor can I find much about the book. It also is new (this year), can be found in only 3 libraries on Worldcat, and was not (yet?) reviewed in Booklist, which reviews books for libraries. (Not getting into Booklist means that libraries are NOT recommended to purchase your book.) So I think the information about the book is premature, although it may have been the impetus for the article. If the article is kept, I recommend putting the information about the book at the bottom of the article (essentially in chronological order). The references also should be beefed up with links, which will save the time of the reader and any reviewers of the article. Weak keep, but needs work. LaMona (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * May Pub. Weekly has review [].E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:35, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Interesting article. I think I would call Strumwasser  a "serial ambitionist" with a bad case of wannabefamous. He's determined to hit it big, if not as a stockbroker, then in Indie Rock, or soda pop, or maybe as a novelist (on Kickstarter ).  This vanity article, created by an SPA, is interesting because he cites appearingly solid sources - but without links (except to attack his ex-wife, that one's linked, making it a chore to check them up.  But, as User:LaMona points out, sources exist.  I think this one, from the New York Daily News, pegs the guy: Pop star wannabe: Stu Strumwasser has raised millions with....  a soda pop company..  He wants ot make it big, will try any route to fame.  However, if the metric for passing WP:GNG is getting major media outlets to profile you "directly and in detail", Stu knows how to get it done. along with "Pop star Wanna be   and the one about the divorce  add up to 3 feature stories (albeit the first one is brief).  There are also sources on his career as a would-be soda-pop  magnate (I just added a couple with links) and some I didn't add about his social media start-up (fail-up?).  Like User:LaMona I vote weak keep.  Why someone with Strumwasser's history of failed ventures and  un-charming relationship with his children's mother  wants his career on Wikipedia is a question for a Freudian psychiatrist. (There can be no violation of BLP when a guy this media-saavy eagerly talks about his marriage with the  New York Daily News.)  I am just following WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.