Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Davis (musician)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The subject has been proven as obviously notable as per WP:MUSIC. There are reliable sources and the subject is notable. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy  ( talk ) 03:51, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Stuart Davis (musician)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable musician, no reliable sources and possible original research. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 13:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Ism schism (talk) 13:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 13:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment There's a resonable amount of coverage in Google News search . Voceditenore (talk) 13:31, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, more than enough ghits to pass WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 13:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, highly notable musician, mentioned in newspaper articles, a fact which is noted in the article. This is part of 's and recent deletion spree, which seems to target New Age figures. &mdash; goethean &#2384; 13:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely passes WP:MUSIC. WilliamH (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. I am happy to opine such as because, although I am somewhat of an inclusionist, I've had to give "thumbs down" to the last half-dozen or so AfD subjects I've reviewed. - House of Scandal (talk) 20:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per all the above. --Bardin (talk) 11:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as above, but aggressively remove any content which does not meet WP:V policy.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  21:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.