Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart G. Bugg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The assertion of notability made by User:DGG has not been disuputed. Regards,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 18:28, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Stuart G. Bugg

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non notable "lawyer, author and consultant" only claim to notability appears to be as co-author of two books Codf1977 (talk) 07:52, 10 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Reluctant Delete - I added a citation to support the claim re World University Debating champion. Unfortunately, the reference appears to be a blog, so it isn't of the highest quality. I've been unsuccessful at finding an official page. Winning this event is worth something, not clear how much. One other winner John Wertheim and one other finalist Adam Spencer have WP entries, in each case, their claim to notability was based upon other criteria. That none of the other roughly 60 champions have a WP page is a suggestion (not proof) that this win does not confer notability.
 * He is named as a founder of efms, an organization that does not get a lot of hits (again, not proof, but an organization founded in 1983 with almost no hits isn't scoring well on a notability scale. In addition, his name is listed at the end of the bylaws, which suggests he was involved in drafting the bylaws, but that doesn't necessarily make him a founder. Perhaps he is, but I don't see clear evidence.
 * I see he is coauthor of two books, unfortunately I find little evidence these two books are notable. Perhaps my searching was incomplete, I'd be happy if more could be found which would tip my opinion to keep, but based upon what is presented, and what I could find, I'm not seeing notability.-- SPhilbrick  T  14:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep   His German book is a German-english legal dictionary published by the leading German language dictionary publisher. The  Karlsruhe Virtual Catalog shows it in over 48 German libraries, and their list is not complete.  DGG ( talk ) 21:08, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG. Stifle (talk) 11:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per DGG. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 16:00, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.