Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Goodman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Stuart Goodman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Essentially a resume in prose form. He's held some sub-cabinet state government posts and been the Arizona lobbyist for some companies. No notable accomplishments in those positions are listed. List of military service, education, job history. The references are all directory type listings confirming he held those positions but nothing more, except one ~100 word prose article saying his firm was hired to represent Apple. This wouldn't seem to meet the "significant coverage" standard of WP:GNG.

Article was created 10 years ago by an account that never did anything else, and hasn't gotten any content edits or inbound links in a decade. Those are not criteria for deletion, of course, but they do suggest that there's just nothing to add to take this beyond prose resume form into encyclopedia article. Which is what is suggested by the apparent lack of sources with non-routine coverage which could be cited. Here2rewrite (talk) 01:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no indicia of encyclopedic notability here. BD2412  T 01:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Most of what is claimed in the lead, was during his late 20s-early 30s.  He was 23 when he was "Associate Director of Government Affairs for the Arizona Multihousing Association" Most likely titles that were non-notable - and possible volunteer -  positions.  User:Arizonapolitical never wrote anything else for Wikipedia, but this article. Possibly the same person as the article subject. — Maile  (talk) 02:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage (but a bunch of quotes and cursory mentions) in the Arizona Republic. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 02:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete No SIGCOV, no independent, secondary, reliable sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Politics,  and Arizona.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Just directories/lists as references. Three of them don't even work anymore. Sadustu Tau (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nominator; listed sources are insufficient to demonstrate notability.  Waqar 💬 09:14, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing much in terms of notability-lending refs. Reads like a promotional CV. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:37, 3 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.