Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Hall High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 16:57, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Stuart Hall High School

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a newer school and lacks the notability of older schools, no sources were given and no hits were found on Google News.  Marlith  T / C  03:56, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's non-notable because it's "newer"? No valid criteria has been given for deletion. Besides, it's actually an affiliate of the historic Convent of the Sacred Heart High School, but this wing was created for boys (the former is girls). Giving some WP:OR here, I know personally the buildings are attached.  WP:OUTCOMES shows that WP:CONSENSUS has stipulated that high/secondary schools are notable and the nom has given no reason to single this one out to delete. --Oakshade 05:30, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * SHHS and Convent are ten blocks away from each other actually. Convent is a notable school, but not SHHS.  Marlith  T / C  03:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I'll take your word for it on the 10 blocks, but they are affiliated. --Oakshade 03:27, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, they are.  Marlith  T / C  03:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak keep per Oakshade. — xDanielx T/C 06:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * No idea about notability, but kudos to whoever decided to name a school after Stuart Hall :-) ChrisTheDude 11:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Everybody loved It's a knockout, even in San Fransisco. Presumably everyone dresses up as twenty foot tall knights at break time and tries to pour coloured water into huge tubes on roundabouts while throwing jelly at each other.  Nick mallory 12:55, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I wonder if my hours spent on Wikipedia will look good when I apply here.  Marlith  T / C  03:15, 16 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as nn school. Eusebeus 23:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per a complete lack of source material verifying notability. Van Tucky  Talk 04:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment &mdash; This school is too small to meet by personal criteria, and shows no other evidence of significance. &mdash; RJH (talk) 19:57, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Oakshade. VivianDarkbloom 21:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It is correct in what it says. If you want more state what you need I actually go there, so adding factual info would be no problem. --Fiyero554 05:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Fiyero554
 * Weak Keep as extension of existing notable school system and based on WP:OUTCOMES consensus that such schools are notable. Alansohn 18:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.