Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart S. Janney III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:09, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Stuart S. Janney III

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not pass the muster at WP:BIO and WP:GNG as most of the coverage is non-substantive and/or backed by primary sources. Some of the sources cover relatives of the individual, however notability is not WP:INHERITED. — Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  00:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC) —  Nearly Headless Nick   {c}  00:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 01:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 01:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 01:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable person. "American heir"? Makes no sense. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:52, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The sourcing doesn't indicate notability. Simply being an "heir", especially one who's own parents aren't notable enough heirs to merit their own articles, doesn't establish notability, which we all know is not inherited. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:03, 20 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.