Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart little 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete without prejudice to recreation when more information becomes available. PhilKnight (talk) 23:13, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Stuart little 4

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article only consists of unsourced rumours. StaticGull Talk  15:33, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I disagree, it was from an article on wikipedia that i came across the information regarding the fourth film, and so as more information becomes available, it will be added Mrmccollough (talk) 15:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * You got this information off another Wikipedia article? Which one? Glass  Cobra  15:37, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * yes i did... Stuart Little (film) under sequels...Mrmccollough (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I went and removed it. With no sourcing and all incarnations of a SL4 article having been deleted, it should not have been mentioned. Glass  Cobra  16:01, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Agree, should not be created until further information is available. -- Meldshal  (§peak to me)  16:39, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: There is redundancy between this AfD and Articles for deletion/Stuart little 4 (2nd nomination). We need to fix this. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 21:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. The comments below by Chafford (as nominator), Mrmccollough, and Erik were from the other AfD, which I am closing to merge it with this one. StaticGull also left a comment very similar to his nomination statement here, and Erik copied his note about the redundancy to both AfDs. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Chafford (talk) 15:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * However since this film IS in the works, as more information becomes available it shall be added Mrmccollough (talk) 15:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Do you have any evidence to suggest that it is in the works. Google shows nothing. — Erik  (talk • contrib) - 20:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL; no verifiable information about this project. — Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:31, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 20:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No WP:N or WP:RS at all. There is also plenty of crystall ball issues. Artene50 (talk) 09:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:CRYSTAL Themfromspace (talk) 18:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NFF - all rumour. JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice return informations when confirmed by reliable sources. Michael Q. Schmidt (talk) 04:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.