Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StubMail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

StubMail

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability tag placed in 2008; still no evidence of notability. Delete per WP:GNG. Esquivalience  t 01:00, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's simply nothing to suggest even minimally better, and it's likely there's no available solid improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  07:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: My searches are not locating evidence that this product attained notability. It is also covered adequately and in context on the Meng Weng Wong page. AllyD (talk) 07:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.