Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuck on fuckin' you (lady gaga song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Born This Way. WP:NSONG points to merging, not deletion. Content can also be merged to Lady Gaga discography. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:13, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Stuck_on_fuckin'_you_(lady_gaga_song)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only an infobox!Müdigkeit (talk) 01:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, no encyclopedic information. J I P  &#124; Talk 05:38, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No even worthy of a redirect. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. GNews search for this awesome title generates 40+ hits, including an article from Rolling Stone. (I've added a sentence of context and a link to this source.) According to that source, the song is a legitimate (albeit free) release, and as such, this information deserves a home somewhere in Gaga's Wikipedia coverage, whether that may be a separate article or as part of some other appropriate article. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:52, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge relevant info to Lady Gaga discography. Most things Gaga touches seem to become notable but, in this instance, I can only see the Rolling Stone article online. This is clear evidence the track exists and is of some note, though not sufficient for its own article. Sionk (talk) 20:20, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. If the article title space was correctly capitalized I would concur. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:14, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:35, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:38, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge verifiable content to Born This Way and Lady Gaga discography, then redirect to Born This Way. A search for the song on Billboard.com turned up nothing, so I assume it hasn't charted. That, combined with a dearth of significant coverage means it fails WP:NSONG IMO. I think the Rolling Stone source can support a couple sentences, and I agree that the information deserves a home somewhere. Braincricket (talk) 04:40, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge verifiable content to Born This Way and redirect there per WP:NSONGS: "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song" and "articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album." This does not warrant a stand-alone article, but is a probable search term.  It is mentioned at Lady Gaga discography, but the album it is an outtake from seems like a more proper redirect target.  Cliff  Smith 21:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This is an outtake. All information that would be useful could be added to Born This Way and the article deleted. No need for a redirect. — ΛΧΣ  21™  18:27, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.