Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StudioFilmClub


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Peter Doig. Nakon 07:09, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

StudioFilmClub

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable film club, hosted by a notable artist. Notability is not inherited. Dweller (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to founder Peter Doig. I might certainly be mentioned there even if lacking separate notability.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:00, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * it lacks notability, it should be deleted. It's not a plausible typo. --Dweller (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you may misunderstand what this encyclopedia is all about, as many topics that lack notability for separate articles can still be mentioned elsewhere within these pages. And THIS topic CAN be sourced for it's connection with Peter Doig. For anyone who searches for the term, and it is not "implausible".. Heck, this topic may even merit its own article in a few months or years... just not yet.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 23:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Can you debate without the need for that kind of patronising stuff? "you may misunderstand what this encyclopedia is all about". Ridiculous from another admin. Taking this off my watchlist. --Dweller (talk) 00:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Trinidad and Tobago-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I have struck that portion to which you take issue. Point here being that it IS a reasonable search term and redirect serves our readers.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.