Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio 158


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 04:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Studio 158

 * — (View AfD)

Tagged for CSD with "POV, questionable notability, article even less encyclopedic than at last tagging for deletion", none of which are CSD, but all of which are good reasons that the article ought to be deleted. Was previously deprodded. Kchase T 04:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete No real notability. --Wildnox(talk) 04:24, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article makes no sense to me. Tonytypoon 05:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete seems to fail WP:NOTE -- Bec-Thorn-Berry 06:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as a business, fails WP:CORP, other than that it's simply non-notable. SkierRMH 08:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 10:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. ~ EdBoy[c] 19:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not really sourced, not really notable.-- danntm T C 22:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.