Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio 2000


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:32, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Studio 2000

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  11:24, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:26, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:26, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:56, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: Not notable, not enough sources.124Sanroque (talk) 16:39, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep/redirect – Makes a decent case for meeting GNG. At the very least, we should merge and redirect to AEBN. --- Coffee  and crumbs  02:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:NORG. Nothing to merge and sufficiently obscure so it's unlikely to be a search term. --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:38, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:SIGCOV Kakaey (talk) 07:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.