Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio Altius


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Listed for 14 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Studio Altius

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Building is asserted to be notable via its historic location, but the building does not appear to be individually listed on the NRHP. The current occupant of the building appears to be a non-notable company --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The building, at 3518 Greenwood, is a contributing property to the Greenwood Historic District. (See the National Register nomination, page 7.)  Actually, though, the historic district and its buildings are more worthy of an article than Studio Altius is, so I think we should rewrite the article about the historic district and include whatever is worthy from . --Elkman (Elkspeak) 22:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep and rewrite per Elkman: this could easily be the core of an article on a notable topic. Nyttend (talk) 12:26, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.