Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studio Foglio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect to Phil Foglio. Yomangani talk 15:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Studio Foglio


Has been tagged for importance since May 18. Nothing has been added to this stub since September, and it definitely fails WP:NN and (because of its unedited state), also fails WP:STUB. Diez2 17:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. The chief merit of this page is to point readers in the direction of Phil Foglio and Kaja Foglio, highly notable individual artists.  The studio is apparently their joint business venture, and considered alone, probably does not merit an article on its own.  This information could of course be merged into either or both individual articles to get rid of the stub. In that case it should be redirected, which raises the delicate question of where to redirect to.  Best to leave this stub as a sort of disambiguation page.  - Smerdis of Tlön 18:19, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability other than their own website. Edison 20:16, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Phil's own article. The studio is not notable. (Phil, on the other hand, is a Hugo nominee.)-- Orange Mike 21:59, 17 November 2006 (UTC) correction : Hugo-winner-- Orange Mike 22:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Phil as the far more notable of the two, and as the one whose article isn't a stub. Xtifr tälk 06:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. Sandstein 06:53, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep on the notability of Phil Foglio. TheRealFennShysa 20:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.