Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Studiotraffic (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 20:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Studiotraffic
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not seeing much here that establishes notability. Might be salvaged if some kind of good 3rd party sourcing is found. Current references are 3 archived screenshots of the website itself, and an internet forum. Sperril (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  18:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  18:16, 28 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as not only is the current article not better despite all this time and 2 past AfDs, there's nothing at all to suggest a better notable article which makes it worse. Notifying past AfDers, , , and .  SwisterTwister   talk  05:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete This should be speedy deleted as a recreation of a deleted page.  Gamaliel  ( talk ) 05:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree, but it survived an AFD as NC after the first deletion so I thought speedy now would be inappropriate. Sperril (talk) 19:28, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not enough in-depth coverage from reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.