Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Study Techniques


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete - performed by User:Ponyo. UtherSRG (talk) 19:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Study Techniques

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I had to decline the speedy on this, as it didn't fit A11, nor any of the others. Fails WP:NOTGUIDE at the very least. Ged UK  13:25, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this sort of thing is not within scope of Wikipedia. Possibly could be transwikied to Wikiversity. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:45, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this is nothing more than an essay and spam. PICKLEDICAE🥒 13:51, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Essay, with no lead or intro. We don't have a special version of wiki for students, as the notes at the bottom suggest. Appears to be OR. Oaktree b (talk) 15:23, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Hard fails via WP:NOR. In fact, the article's author says this is "Invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator" which is the very definition of OR. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:28, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't place too much on that, the OP has been adding nutshell templates all over that article and talk page for some reason. Ged  UK  16:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * speedy delete I've found study skills which seems to be close enough to warrant CSD A10. Since I've weighed in here, I feel that I should not do the delete myself. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * That's a great candidate to fit A10. I don't think I should action it though as this is my nom and I declined the last one. Someone will pick it up. Ged  UK  16:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm wholly uninvolved here, so I've speedy deleted per A10.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 19:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as a badly-written essay. I'd advise the article creator to do some actual studying (not least, on what Wikipedia is for), before attempting to tell others how to do it. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:NOTGUIDE. Hughesdarren (talk) 21:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is WP:OR and WP:NOTHOWTO with no sign of any notability or even significance. I tagged this as a speedy deletion based on lack of significance and OR, but there remains no merit to this article  Velella  Velella Talk 22:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this semi-literate garbage. Can't this junk be speedied? --  Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 22:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I wish there was a CSD criterion that would fit this, but there isn't. A discussion for CSD perhaps. Ged  UK  16:36, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - semi-literate is an overestimate. "time is impotent for study" and "we take brake in between the Process of grasping some think" - some think this is nonsense. Oculi (talk) 23:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A10, incomprehensible rewrite of Study skills. Article creator's last opus, Finfish and fins, was just as bad. Storchy (talk) 17:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.