Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 13:41, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable clinical study. There are thousands of clinical studies, some are worthy of an encyclopedic article, this isn't one of them. &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 23:19, 15 November 2008 (UTC) --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 15:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   -- &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 00:04, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - this study is huge. There will be countless hundreds of pages of research done on these results. We just need someone to write it up. - 08:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep There are many sources:*http://news.google.com/archivesearch?ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&tab=wn&q=Study+of+Tamoxifen+and+Raloxifene
 * Delete. This page has little chance of expanding without causing fragmentation. It would be better to use the material created with the study to expand the articles on the relevant drugs. - Mgm|(talk) 16:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge into the articles on the appropriate drugs RogueNinja talk  19:44, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Merging into two articles introduces duplication; the best solution for organizational purposes is to keep it as a separate article and link with a short summary from the articles on the individual drugs. I'm assuming that the study is notable enough for its own article because it has been described in the news as "one of the largest breast cancer prevention studies ever". --Itub (talk) 10:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.