Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stumble Guys


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 01:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Stumble Guys

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No significant coverage in reliable sources to show notability. Mainly gaming blogs. CNMall41 (talk) 00:49, 7 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The game is a significantly played game (over 225 million downloads), more than lots of other video game articles. Will be updating with more sources soon. CanO27sprite (talk) 01:24, 7 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:38, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Already existed at Draft:Stumble Guys but was rejected twice and ignored, the creator clearly is WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not advertising. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all hits are SEO type sites. This isn't for advertising your game. No media coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 14:28, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I was the creator of the draft, but it has no purpose now, since it has no significant media coverage. Sarrail (talk) 16:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 20:33, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not affiliated or associated with Stumble Guys or Kitka Games in any way. I simply want to publish an article in response to the surge in popularity of this game. This is not my game. CanO27sprite (talk) 22:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Ignoring legitimate issues with your draft that were clearly stated does not help your case with regards to not looking like a spammer. It is the typical modus operandi of spammers to ignore procedure and push through a clearly non-notable article, as otherwise they would not be making money through Wikipedia's free publicity (WP:SPAM). If you are here to build an encyclopedia, getting a single specific article rejected shouldn't phase you, as there are plenty of others in need of work or creation. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:47, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment I found one WP:VGRS review:
 * I guess with that and the VGC/Dot Esports articles you could make a weak case, but its not enough to push me to vote keep. If there was one more review from a VGRS I'd think that would be enough to keep. Jumpytoo Talk 08:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * https://www.pocketgamer.biz/news/79575/scopely-acquires-stumble-guys-from-kitka-games/ Is also a WP:VGRS review CanO27sprite (talk) 17:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * And so is https://www.videogameschronicle.com/news/a-fall-guys-clone-called-stumble-guys-has-topped-the-iphone-game-charts/ CanO27sprite (talk) 17:09, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The PocketGamer source is NOT a review, it is almost entirely a press release. VGC is routine news (see WP:CORPDEPTH, which notes "standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage" as examples of trivial coverage) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The PocketGamer source is NOT a review, it is almost entirely a press release. VGC is routine news (see WP:CORPDEPTH, which notes "standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage" as examples of trivial coverage) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:07, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.