Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stumbling Cat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. North America1000 05:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Stumbling Cat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. The article was created to promote Potions: A Curious Tale, a non-notable game. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 03:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Psychotic   Spartan  123  03:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP: GNG. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) may the force be with you 03:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep No longer fails WP: GNG User:RikuKat (talk) 04:04, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The sources in use are not reliable, independent sources. (?) czar ⨹   08:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete failing WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. RikuKat's attempt is appreciated morally here, but a business registration (not in-depth by nature, only proves existence) and a link to a non-notable previous project by one of the founders is far from satisfying the notability requirements. It is unsurprisingly hard to establish notability when the company's only product listed in the article has still not confirmed its release date.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 07:14, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah AirMech is okay (in notability), but still notability is not inherited just by sharing common key people.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 07:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. The1337gamer (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It did not have any meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. A redirect to the related Potions game would be worthwhile, but that's also at AfD and I don't think it will stay. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ⨹   08:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.