Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stunning Beaded Tapestries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Stunning Beaded Tapestries
This is a huge advertisement. It links directly to ebay, and looks like it was copied directly from ebay. Not an encyclopedia entry. I am also nominating Gorgeous beaded Hand Bags for the same reasons as stated above. (Similar advertisement and was written by the same author) --Valermos 20:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

style="color: rgb(255, 10, 0);"> Humphreys SPEAK TO MEABOUTWHAT I MESSED UP 23:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - obviously not encyclopedic, more like junk mail to me. I think this would be better off elsewhere. This is the first time I've participated in an AFD, is this formatted correct?? --Whithulme 20:34, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - These probably qualify for Speedy Deletion, but I wasn't sure how to list them as such. To Whithulme: Voted, commented and signed... That's all you need :) --Valermos 20:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Both per nom. Fail WP:SPAM quite markedly.  Not really speediable - only potential category is G3, and they've been put up to sell the product rather than to damage Wikipedia. Tevildo 20:49, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - is it odd a new user votes in an AFD (Article for deletion)?? --Whithulme 20:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. AfD's aren't really _votes_ - the outcome doesn't depend on one side getting a majority. In a controversial AfD, the closing admin may decide to ignore or downgrade the opinions of new users, especially if they're suspected of being meatpuppets.  However, in an uncontroversial case such as this, the history of a user isn't an issue. Tevildo 21:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tom Harrison Talk 21:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Since when did encyclopaedic entries say no checks or money orders thanks ! at the end ??? Fails WP:SPAM David <span
 * Delete Kinda surprised there isnt a speedy deletion policy for such blatant spam. Resolute 01:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.