Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stunts (album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Acather96 (talk) 18:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Stunts (album)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article fails notability criteria for albums. Independent released albums are generally not notable and no source contradicts this. Armbrust WrestleMania XXVII  Undertaker 19–0  23:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Independently released albums are very often notable - I find that a curious deletion rationale. This one certainly is - coverage includes an Allmusic review, SPIN, Billboard, SF Weekly, Los Angeles Times.--Michig (talk) 08:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 01:20, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as just a track listing (WP:NALBUMS) Bob House 884 (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment- That's a rationale for additional sourced content, not deletion. Dru of Id (talk) 11:23, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting." Bob House 884 (talk) 12:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * So you meant to vote 'Merge'? Dru of Id (talk) 14:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No. I would !vote merge if there was any sourced, encyclopedic content of value which would be lost if the article were deleted. This page is literally just a track listing which anybody could find on google within a minute, so I don't think its worth wasting time formally going through the process of a merge. Bob House 884 (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - the AllMusic review can usually suffice for basic notability in an album article. The whole thing does need to be expanded, but I also find the nominator's rationale about independent releases curious. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 16:47, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Allmusic review plus the other sources provided by Michig argue for notability, and provide a basis for expansion. I too do not understand which guideline makes independent albums generally non-notable. Rlendog (talk) 18:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.