Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stupendous Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to Calvin and Hobbes. howcheng  [ t &#149; c &#149; w &#149;  e  ] 17:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

Stupendous Man
This and all other comic stubs are much to insignificant to be listed in their own article. There is already a discription of Stupendous Man in the Calvin and Hobbes article.--FelineFanatic13 16:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * DELETE: As much as I love Calvin and Hobbes, I can't see this worthy of an entry. --Censorwolf 20:44, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Calvin and Hobbes since redirects are free. Hiding talk 23:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect indeed. It's a possible search term, and redirects are indeed free. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 23:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect if there's nothing to merge. android  79  23:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Neutral Once we start deleting articles like this its only a short step to deleting Oliver Twist and Bilbo Baggins.Jcuk 10:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Quite a long step, I'd say. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 11:54, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, I agree it is to insignificant to stay -Frogman1326


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.