Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stupid Place

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk 01:16, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Stupid Place
Delete probably ad. nn regardless. I listed as speedy but tag was removed. Also delete the redirects: Stupidplace.com, Stupid place.com, Stupidplace. TheMidnighters 22:25, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Crush with llama, ad about seemingly non-notable website (was going to Vfd it myself just now). No it's not really a speedy (the ad section of the CSD rectification poll failed I think), so the slower method will have to do. GarrettTalk 04:01, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Socks ahead. --TheMidnighters 05:18, 25 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, this page is perfectly fine and does not violate any rules. It seems that the user TheMidnighters is vandalising this page. I will have to procede in the banning of this user if he does not stop voting for deletion of this page. NataliaBacha 08:04, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User has five previous edits. -- Visviva 09:33, 25 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, This page has absolutely nothing to do with deletion. It's true TheMidnighters is trying to vandalise this page for absolutely no reason. This guy should be banned. -DarknessFalls 09:06, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User has one previous edit. -- Visviva 09:33, 25 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, Who voted for this page to be deleted? I mean this page has nothing wrong. The users wasting their time on pages like this should be paying more atttention to the bad pages. This page should actually be an example for the other pages since it is neutral and respects all the laws. Jamon 09:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User has six previous edits. -- Visviva 09:33, 25 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as not notable. See What Wikipedia is not.Most Google hits are through link exchange and the site itself is mostly coming soon.  Bollar 05:20, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Alexa rank: 918,913.  And for reference Alexa rank for eBaum's World is 349 -- a slight difference as far as notability goes.  Bollar 23:27, July 25, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable, WP is not a web directory.  Quale 06:07, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. -- Visviva 09:33, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per sockpuppets. CDC   (talk)  16:33, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep,this page is well known especially in the U.K. and Canada, it's like the ebaum's of Europe. Maria6 17:23, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User has one previous edit. -- Bollar 19:31, July 25, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, I don't see how this is different from the other comedy websites, mine as well keept it. It is actually usefull. I checked out the website it is good example of freedom of speech on the net. Elsebo 17:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User has three previous edits. -- Bollar 19:40, July 25, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, I agree this website is also known by a lot of young people I know in Japan. It's the next big thing! -- Seijiro 016:00, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User has three previous edits. -- Bollar 19:58, July 25, 2005 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep, respectful of all regulations -- The Master ChiefTalk 19:06, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User's first edit. --TheMidnighters 23:32, 25 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a web guide. Flowerparty talk 23:22, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep I don't agree with the person above, since their is other websites under the same category. This one is no different than the others. This has nothing to do with web guide, they are just a few web sites that are important to the Internet. This website is very original and different and is in my opinion better than ebaums's world. Hoffnung 23:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User's first edit. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 23:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)


 * 'Keep, Who is the idiot who voted this page to be deleted. There are many other more contreversial pages on Wiki and this page should not even being considered to be deleted. This page is perfectly fine. Malikshaheed 23:36, 25 July 2005
 * User's first edit. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 23:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable, and sockpuppets tick me off. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 23:37, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Stop the madness! Junkyard prince 23:40, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, good page with no problems what so ever Bunba 00:06, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User's first edit. --Blu Aardvark | (talk) 00:07, 26 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. Alexa rating 918,913 (vs. 349 for ebaumsworld).  If it gets popular first, then it may merit an article but Wikipedia is not here to boost a site. DS1953 03:22, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not established. JamesBurns 06:42, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, why are you comparing it to ebaumsworld. this page deserves to be on wikipedia. alexa doesn't meen crap anyways it's all about the business. -Jkwon67 00:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
 * User's first edit. --TheMidnighters 00:47, 27 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:SOCK.  Grue   05:28, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.