Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuttgarter Flugdienst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  10:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Stuttgarter Flugdienst

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a corporate charter airline with a fleet of small aircraft which in my opinion fails WP:CORP. It has not been significantly covered in any reliable, independent sources. --FoxyOrange (talk) 00:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, aircraft operators are not intrinsically notable and must satisfy WP:CORP, and this doesn't. YSSYguy (talk) 04:09, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep This Google News search turns up quite a few sources. --Cerebellum (talk) 13:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Cerebellum, the link you provided does not seem to work. With me, a google news search does not reveal anything. Could you please give the exact article(s) that you think establish notability? --FoxyOrange (talk) 13:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete using a translator, those sources mentioned above looks like press releases or passing mentions. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Secret account 22:46, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.