Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StykFaktor (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 03:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

StykFaktor
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is probably a better way of deciding what to do with this article rather than going through speedy deletion (this has already been done) As I was able to establish on the talk page, after the author looked up this article on various searches, and there is limited WP:RS, and notability. He/she did come up with a music review. The question is if this article is noteworthy enough and has enough sources. BrianY (talk) 03:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - First off it appears to be in violation of CSD G4, recreation of deleted materials. But besides that point the references used in the article have suspect reliability, who is this Jason Baker person who gave it a review is he a professional or a blogger? The same goes for this Mike Mercer, I don't know how reliable he is either so it seems to me relying on sources like this as the backbone of the article is not all that smart. If there were other sources that are a little more reputable then I would think that this group could very well be notable.-- Marcusmax  ( speak ) 03:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - To meet WP:N the article would need to contain discussion or analysis of the group/artist by independent neutral sources, with appropriate citations. It doesn't yet have those, so delete.  If sources are found and added, I'll change my vote to keep. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.