Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stylah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the nomination was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 06:20, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Stylah
I'm nominating several articles for rappers connected to the AfDed article Poisonous Poets (separately.) A search for the "#1 U.S. seller" mentioned in the article returns two google hits (including Wikipedia!) There's nothing in here that meets WP:MUSIC so far... If he does meet it, improve the article and cite your source. Grand master  ka  06:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC.-- Tdxi an  g  07:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Poisonous Poets are one of the biggest acts in British hip-hop, and suggesting them for deletion is in my opinion ludicrous. They have received HEAVY rotation on mainstream radio, toured nationally, and in UK hip-hop at least, mixtapes are the main format of distribution, as there is far less backing from major labels compared to the US scene. Check my edit history for UK rap knowledge reliability. Yeanold Viskersenn 11:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: The facts mentioned should be written in the article, with reliable sources. As the article is now written it fails WP:MUSIC. Kimchi.sg 16:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mango juice talk 16:56, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Doing some research on this, I can find a few links listing this artist as the newest member of this band, however I do not see mention of this band's success on any UK charts. Wildthing61476 17:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete after doing a little research, I think I could be convinced that the group is notable. However, I see no evidence that the individual members warrent their own pages. --djrobgordon 18:55, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.