Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Styles and recolourations of Ashlee Simpson's hair


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 02:52, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

Styles and recolourations of Ashlee Simpson's hair
Fancruft -- Longhair | Talk 13:58, 28 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete -- Longhair | Talk 13:58, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- How disturbing it is to know there are people who'd make this an encyclopedia article. --Belgrader 14:00, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopedic topic. jni 14:02, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete waste o' time Youngamerican 14:21, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lovely. This from an encyclopedia that until yesterday didn't have an article on Bernard Miles. Unencyclopedic cruft.--Scimitar parley 14:31, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete useless info, who writes this stuff? Uber nemo 14:34, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Ashlee Simpson. Mmmbeer 14:43, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, trolling. Everyking 14:50, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * No. --84.65.111.181 14:53, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * It appears, on the surface, that you are carrying on a joke about us having "fancruft" info. If you really did make this article is good faith, either add it to the main article (as you probably know, I've been arguing for including some of this info there) or here (at this wiki there will be fewer restrictions). Everyking 15:03, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia is not paper - this could be a useful resource, once expanded. --84.65.111.181 14:51, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Fernando Rizo T/C 17:47, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Haircruft? Dancruft? whatever it is Delete. DJ Clayworth 15:08, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; Wow, is this a trivia category? &mdash; RJH 15:54, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Dunc|&#9786; 16:26, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hall Monitor 16:53, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Ashlee SimpsonGateman1997 17:11, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Is it the End of Days? Everyking voting delete on an Ashlee Simpson article?  (Cheer up, you know this is gentle ribbing...)  This is way too crufty, delete. humblefool&reg; 18:22, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN this Ashleecruft. 23skidoo 18:33, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Someone's tweaking Everyking's nose. --Carnildo 18:48, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, disturbing K1Bond007 19:07, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete the Ashlee articles are getting WAY out of hand. Doesn't even deserve an airing on BJAODN. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  19:08, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, and did anybody else think it was appropriate that it was User:Longhair who placed the deletion notice? ;) TenOfAllTrades(talk) 21:36, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Color it deleted. Doctor Whom 22:22, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probably mockery of Everyking; if not, subtrivial. Dpbsmith (talk) 01:00, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: I'm sure these facts are important to some poeple, but 5 styles in three years, for a (female) professional in the performing arts, is not remarkable. Peter Grey 03:49, 30 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.