Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StylishBritain.co.uk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:58, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

StylishBritain.co.uk

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This company lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Whpq (talk) 18:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. I looked online before commenting, by various searches, including this; see also the search links above. There are literally zero reliable sources about this company online. Bearian (talk) 21:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. If one uses a google web search string of ("StylishBritain" -amazon -pinterest -ebay -twitter -facebook -wikipedia), the search results are rather telling. -- Whpq (talk) 21:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly CSD A7: A WP:SPA WP:COI article on a website for which no evidence of notability can be found (nor any Alexa rating). And when the article text puts such a strong emphasis on associated social media pages having been launched in 2014 (with 52 Twitter followers), it encourages a conclusion that there is a lack of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 06:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above - no coverage found in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG.  Gongshow   talk  09:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY and issues of WP:COI. --Jersey92 (talk) 17:13, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing showing up on the usually reliable DuckDuckGo.com. I've also looked at their website: no suitable press comment there. I'd also like to say that what they have on offer is neither stylish nor particularly cutting-edge, so we might get them on "truth in advertising" as well! :-) RomanSpa (talk) 16:09, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.