Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StylishandTrendy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 19:41, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

StylishandTrendy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG; uncited circulation that as yet another women's "online" magazine, does not meet additional niche circulation requirements. ( talk→  BWilkins   ←track ) 18:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. --Guillaume2303 (talk) 19:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:WEB. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, insufficient sources for WP:GNG. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 20:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails to meet any of our standards for notability; reeks of promotion. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  14:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.