Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StyroHawk kite


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

StyroHawk kite

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Minimally sourced article that doesn't indicate any indication of significance from third party reliable sources aside from that from the U.S. Patent Office. Existence is insufficient for a standalone Wikipedia article: third-party coverage by reliable sources are necessary. Prod was contested in 2008; another editor tried to apply a second prod in 2009; I moved the article to its current name as the original disambiguation was misleading. This had a refimprove tag from February 2008 before I replaced it with a articleissues just before this nomination. B.Wind (talk) 01:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep article could be fixed IMO. RP459 (talk) 04:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no improvement in over a year; article doesn't satisfy WP:N or WP:PRODUCT. -- Zim Zala Bim talk  14:43, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. (sorry, didn't see the previous PROD). Article's talk page has more comments (mine included) commented on the lack of notability of the topic and non-viability of the page. DMacks (talk) 20:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.