Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SubAudible Hum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per the lone reason for retention, accompanied by said article's improvement, which has not been rebutted. –MuZemike 22:46, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

SubAudible Hum

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:MUSIC. no signficant coverage. LibStar (talk) 07:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * comment this should come out as a keep as j award nominated albums were featured albums and featured albums have tracks place on medium to high rotation. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:04, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete No coverage except for a few sentence mention on a news website. Not enough to justify a page. mboverload @ 02:13, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I've provided references for the article and it now satisfies wp:n. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:41, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.