Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SubViewer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:46, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

SubViewer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't see any evidence of notability here, and I don't see any in-depth coverage in Google search results. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:35, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 10:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 10:24, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails the GNG; the only reliable sources I've been able to find for SubViewer are brief mentions of its file format being supported by other programs. --XenonNSMB (talk, contribs) 22:31, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not meet general notability criteria. Very poor sources, none secondary or reliable in nature. Spyder212 (talk) 23:02, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.