Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subconscious music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Subconscious music

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

May not meet WP:GNG. An unnoticeable record label with nothing noticeable. Sources really don't come up with any information about the label. Will211 (talk) 21:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:42, 12 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Completely non-notable; fails WP:MUSIC. Zero reliable third-party sources, and article itself has no citations. The one link therein has no content and merely links to a Bandcamp page. sixty nine   • speak up •  01:16, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not yet any solid signs of a better applicably notable article for a record company. SwisterTwister   talk  07:45, 13 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.